Section: 7.1/7.3
Line Number:
Homeowner Comment: Currently, regular assessments may not be increased more than 10% in a year without owner approval. The revisions to section 7.1 and 7.3 remove that limitation on the board's power. I do not agree that such limitation should be approved. The board should have to justify and get owner approval of any increase in dues of more than 10%, as has been the case for decades.
Suggested Revision: Currently, regular assessments may not be increased more than 10% in a year without owner approval. The revisions to section 7.1 and 7.3 remove that limitation on the board's power. I do not agree that such limitation should be approved. The board should have to justify and get owner approval of any increase in dues of more than 10%, as has been the case for decades.
Reason/Explanation:
Submitted by: Ryan Brown
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 11:55:09
Section: 7.3. 7.4 Special Assessments
Line Number:
Homeowner Comment: A limit should be set on the amount of increase allowed when setting the yearly unit Assessment amount. for example, a maximum increase of 10%.
All Special Assessments of any kind should follow the procedure in section 7.4.2
Suggested Revision: A limit should be set on the amount of increase allowed when setting the yearly unit Assessment amount. for example, a maximum increase of 10%.
All Special Assessments of any kind should follow the procedure in section 7.4.2
Reason/Explanation:
Submitted by: Kathryn Schroeder
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-11-30 18:57:21
Section: 7.5
Line Number: 511
Homeowner Comment: Change wording to "those expenses provided in the budget accepted at the annual meeting."
Suggested Revision: Change wording to "those expenses provided in the budget accepted at the annual meeting."
Reason/Explanation: How was it determined that $15,000 was the limiting dollar value used for the board to pay for Goods or Services which the Board deems to be of general benefit. This wording is very vague and leads me to believe that the Board could determine this on their own and without notification to Unit owners on any dollar value under $15,000. If a budget was passed, I agree that expenses need to be paid but this section appears to give the board at will, the right to pay for items they deem could generally benefit unit owners.
Submitted by: Robert Voeks
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 11:54:20
Section: 12.2
Line Number: 902
Homeowner Comment: Should “several responsibility” be “severable responsibility”?
Suggested Revision: Should “several responsibility” be “severable responsibility”?
Reason/Explanation:
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:04:00
Section: 11.3
Line Number: 848
Homeowner Comment: Clarify what the notification requirements are.
Suggested Revision: Clarify what the notification requirements are.
Reason/Explanation: What are the requirements for notification of intended entry to Unit Owner? I can’t imagine sending an email 5 minutes prior meets the intent of this.
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:03:22
Section: 11.3
Line Number: 843
Homeowner Comment: Clarify what is meant by a “major alteration”.
Suggested Revision: Clarify what is meant by a “major alteration”.
Reason/Explanation: Does this mean the Board can enter someone’s house if they are remodeling the kitchen e.g. flooring, cabinets, appliances, or paint?
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:02:23
Section: 11.2
Line Number: 832
Homeowner Comment: Clarify what it means to enter a Unit Owner's lot.
Suggested Revision: Clarify what it means to enter a Unit Owner's lot.
Reason/Explanation: Does allowing the Board to enter a Unit Owner’s lot include going through gated fences to the backyard? I would hope not.
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:01:56
Section: 11.2
Line Number: 833
Homeowner Comment: Clarify what an "occupied structure" means.
Suggested Revision: Clarify what an "occupied structure" means.
Reason/Explanation: Does “occupied structure” mean a structure intended for human occupancy or a structure that actually has people occupying it or does it mean a structure that has obtained a certificate of occupancy? I can’t imagine this means the Board can enter someone’s house if they are not home.
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:01:22
Section: 9.3
Line Number: 704
Homeowner Comment: Clarify what it means to have “ownership maintained”
Suggested Revision: Clarify what it means to have “ownership maintained”
Reason/Explanation: Is it possible to be a Unit Owner and not be a member of the Association?
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 12:00:26
Section: 8.5
Line Number:
Homeowner Comment: Recommend providing or pointing to a list of examples that would and would not require ARC review.
Suggested Revision: Recommend providing or pointing to a list of examples that would and would not require ARC review.
Reason/Explanation: There is a lot of ambiguity over what would require ARC review.
Submitted by: Jeff Vanderpol
Administrator Response: Pending
Date Approved: 2025-12-01 11:59:30
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
